When was the boeing 717 made

The underfloor baggage and cargo holds, capacity The engine nacelles, manufactured by Goodrich, are mounted on the rear of the fuselage. The engine pylons manufactured by ShinMaywa Industries Inc are based on the design for the MD aircraft but are thinner and are strengthened with an extra frame. The high bypass ratio engines give very high fuel efficiency. There are three fuel tanks of 13,l capacity installed in the wing roots and in the centre section of the fuselage.

Two auxiliary fuel tanks can be installed in the cargo holds in the underfloor section, increasing the fuel capacity to 16,l. A fuel recirculation system prevents ice formation and build up on the wing. The landing gear is hydraulically operated retractable tricycle-type with twin wheels on all three units.

The maximum altitude and range of the aircraft are 11,m and 2,km respectively. The take-off and landing distances of the aircraft are 1,m and 1,m respectively. The aircraft weighs around 30,kg and its maximum take-off weight is 49,kg.

Biggles Labelling Limited is the industry's leading internal aircraft placards manufacturer and supplier. We provide an unrivalled portfolio of decals and placards for a full range of commercial, freight and executive aircraft.

Aerospace Technology is using cookies We use them to give you the best experience. Continue Learn More X. Advertise with us. Crew Two pilot and co-pilot. The number had been used in relation to a military fuel tanker but otherwise, it was free to use. Construction of the first began in May, at which time Boeing was also having trouble making any further sales of the aircraft. The original 50 were not ever a certainty due to the post instability of the airline market.

The roll-out ceremony took place on 10 June and the maiden flight 3 months later on 02 September A year later on 01 September , the gained type certification and the same month AirTran Airways received their first aircraft. Once the Boeing was in service, it began to gain popularity with passengers and operators alike.

The Boeing interior is set out in a 2 — 3 seating configuration. This means there are two seats on one side of the aisle and 3 on the other. The beauty of this for passengers is that there is only one column of middle seats, as opposed to the common configuration of the Boeing and A in which there are of course 2 columns of middle seats. It was also faster than the BAe one of its nearest rivals. AirTran stated that the C check, which was performed every 4, flying hours, took 3 days as compared to 21 days for the DC9.

This represented huge savings. They already had the family which covered most of the single-aisle market, so the was a one-off. Sales for the were steady and Boeing actively marketed the aircraft to several large airlines who were DC9 operators and needed to upgrade their fleet. In spite of the downturn, Boeing still managed to sell; 19 in , 6 in and 32 in The end of the was brought about by the new regional jets that were starting to be produced by Bombardier of Canada and Embraer of Brazil.

The loss of a large Air Canada order to Bombardier sealed the s future. Boeing decided that it was no longer viable and in January announced that as soon as all orders were filled the production of the would stop. In April the last and th Boeing rolled off the assembly line. AirTran was the first customer and also the last. This was also the.

Even though there was only one model or variant of the Boeing , that is the Sacrificial lamb: Boeing first flight in Share this news. Production innovations In order to reduce the risk of failure and to reduce the upfront costs of developing a new aircraft, McDonnell Douglas sought after partners to develop and produce the new jet. Stepping stone Essentially, Boeing seized the perfect opportunity to experiment with its operations — it received blueprints and initial orders of the jet from McDonnell Douglas together with the assembly plant in Long Beach.

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Reddit Email. Aviation Tops. Top 10 failed fighter jets. Reports on Malaysian fighter jet tender: Tejas in, JF out. Thank you for subscribing! Please check your email and confirm subscription. The Investigation attributed the conflict primarily to a series of flawed judgements by the TWR controller involved whilst also noting one absent and one inappropriate ATC procedure which respectively may have provided a context for the resultant risk.

B, Darwin Australia, On 7 February , a Boeing being operated by Australian airline National Jet on a scheduled passenger service from Nhulunbuy Gove to Darwin flew an unstabilised night visual approach at the destination and made a very hard landing. The landing roll was completed and the aircraft taxied to the terminal. None of the 94 occupants were injured but the aircraft was suffered substantial structural damage and damage to the left hand main landing gear. The non-standard crew response led to an eight minute period of pitch excursions which occurred over a 13, feet height band at recorded ground speeds between and knots prior to eventual recovery and included a split in control columns some two minutes into the upset.

The Investigation concluded that the aircraft had been fully serviceable with all deviations from normal flight initiated or exacerbated by the control inputs of the flight crew.