Why is the myers briggs test used

They feel judged. When they have to confront the lack of scientific validity and reliability, the indicator takes on this very different kind of function, a softer function. If you go to a contemporary Myers-Briggs training session, which I had to do in order to write this book, one of the very interesting things they tell you up front is that under no circumstances are you supposed to refer to it as a test. Because a test is something that has right and wrong answers, a test is something that creates hierarchies of its subjects based on how well they have answered the questions.

This is going to sound a little bit tautological, but the indicator is simply a tool that indicates something to you based on what you have revealed to it. Calling it an indicator and describing it as they do is another way of getting around these questions of validity. The way that the people who offer these [Myers-Briggs] courses or training programs define whether the indicator is working or not is if you personally agree with the type that it has revealed to you.

Maybe you answered the questions as your work self or your social self. Knowledge Wharton: Is there more personality testing now than when Myers-Briggs first came out? The market has grown. Yet Myers-Briggs is still the one that has the most powerful pull on our imagination. You do see them putting their Myers-Briggs type in there. You see Buzzfeed quizzes and type tables about Myers-Briggs and what your Myers-Briggs type says about which Game of Thrones character you are.

This is the product that has continued to have the most endearing and persuasive pull on our imagination of who we are. When the Cambridge Analytica news broke last year, what was interesting to me about that case was that the personality test was initially used as a kind of Trojan Horse. You took a personality test and clicked the terms of services box that allowed Cambridge Analytica to basically scrape your Facebook profile for data. It certainly has evolved, and I think we are less suspicious of it than perhaps we once were.

The first was because psychology at that point was a relatively new discipline. It really had not been institutionalized for very long within higher education. So, the distance between what Katharine Briggs was doing in her home or Isabel Briggs Myers was doing in her home and what somebody like Henry Murray was doing at the Harvard Psychology Clinic or Donald MacKinnon was doing at OSS, that distance was much, much, much smaller than it would seem today.

The second reason is, I think many people have wrongly taken my focus on the fact that this was a mother and daughter to mean that it should be dismissed because it was two women who had no formal training.

I think these women were convinced that the work they were doing as wives and mothers had taught them something, not just about personality, but about how to manage the different kinds of personalities that jostle for your time and attention on any given day.

What is that but management work? Knowledge Wharton: Do you think that we will continue to see a general desire to give tests like Myers-Briggs and others? Emre: I do. I think we are hungry for the kind of self-knowledge that it presents. We are seduced by the fact that it presents that knowledge in a painless and easily digestible way. Unfortunately, due to the small number of studies, meaningful moderator analyses could not be conducted.

Correlations were weighted based on sample size and then corrected for unreliability in both variables. Since few studies reported sample reliabilities, this correction was based on those reported in the test manuals. The table shows the results of these analyses. Their results clearly supported the view that the item pool for Form G was dominated by the predicted four-factor structure. In discussing their results, they wrote:. The criticisms [of the MBTI assessment] that have been offered by its vocal detractors e.

In contrast, [our findings]—especially when viewed in the context of previous confirmatory factor analytic research on the MBTI, and meta-analytic reviews of MBTI reliability and validity studies Harvey, —provide a very firm empirical foundation that can be used to justify the use of the MBTI as a personality assessment device in applied organizational settings.

Bess, T. Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Harvey, R. Reliability and validity. Hammer Ed. McCrae, R. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 52 1 , Pittenger, D. Journal of Career Planning and Placement , 54 1 , For a psychometric tool used in development, arguably the most importance evidence of predictive validity is whether it has demonstrated effective outcomes Rogers, ; Scoular, When occupational tasks are compatible with the preferences or inclinations of the individual performing them, higher satisfaction is likely to result than when the fit is less congruent Dawis, Hammer pointed out some of the difficulties in conducting research on satisfaction, such as a restriction in the range of data on job satisfaction most people tend to say they are satisfied with their job.

He summarized the literature as follows:. When satisfaction is measured globally, its relationship with psychological type is equivocal. However, among those studies that do show a relationship, a pattern seems to emerge. Overall, Introverts and Perceiving types seem less satisfied with their work than do Extraverts and Judging types, although the one study that examined men and women separately suggested that overall results may be misleading if gender is not accounted for. When specific facets or aspects of job satisfaction are employed instead of global measures, the picture becomes clearer.

For example, the T-F scale seems to be important in identifying satisfaction with co-workers. Type theory would predict that different types will have different criteria for satisfaction, and this seems to be at least partially supported by the research. Studies of person-environment fit suggest that those who are dissatisfied in an occupation tend to be those types who are opposite from the modal type in the occupation. A number of studies have also suggested that those types who are less frequent or underrepresented in an occupation tend to be less satisfied or have higher intention to leave the occupation than do those types who are more frequent or whose fit with the occupation is judged to be better.

Hopkins surveyed members of an association of type practitioners the sample was highly educated, high in job tenure, middle-aged, and Caucasian and concluded that people who felt their job matched their personality were more satisfied with their job than were those who did not. SFs were the least satisfied group. In personal telephone calls with some participants, Hopkins personal communication also noted that, of the four process pair groups, SFs seemed the most grateful that someone was listening to them and their concerns.

In his study, co-workers, the work itself, and supervision were far more important to job satisfaction than were pay and promotions. Sitzmann, Ployhart, and Kim went further in investigating the link between personality type, behavior, and occupation.

Using a large sample of , individuals drawn from different occupations, they found that occupations with a high degree of task significance decisions have a large effect on other people, mistakes have a large impact, there is responsibility for the health and safety of others and for their work outcomes show less diversity of personality amongst job incumbents and that this in turn predicts longer job tenure.

In reviewing the literature on type and turnover, the focus has been on the relationship between job fit and job dissatisfaction. Although few studies have been conducted on turnover, those that are available provide some support for the proposition that types working in environments or jobs that are not a good match for their preferences are more likely to leave or to say they are going to leave than are those whose type provides a better fit for either the tasks or the environment.

Ang, M. Advanced communication skills: Conflict management and persuasion. Academic Medicine , 77 11 , Dawis, R. Vocational psychology, vocational adjustment, and the workforce: Some familiar and unanticipated consequences.

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 2 2 , Garden, A. Organizational size as a variable in type analysis and employee turnover. Journal of Psychological Type , 17, Hammer, A.

Career management and counseling. Hopkins, L. Relationships between dimensions of personality and job satisfaction. Katz, L. Journal of Career Assessment , 7 3 , Leong, F. Career specialty choice: A combined research-intervention project. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 67, Journal of Psychological Type , 73 3 , Quintero, A.

The personal interview: Assessing the potential for personality similarity to bias the selection of orthopaedic residents. Academic Medicine , 84 10 , Rogers, J. Coaching with personality type: What works. Schneider, B. The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40 3. Schroeder, C. Effects of assignment in living units by personality types on environmental perceptions and student development. Journal of College Student Personnel , 21 15 , Scoular, A.

The Financial Times guide to business coaching. Sedlock, J. Journal of Psychological Type , 65 1 , Sitzmann, T. A process model linking occupational strength to attitudes and behaviors: The explanatory role of occupational personality heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Psychology , 2 , Stockill, R. Measuring the impact of training and development workshops: an action orientated approach. Thomas, A. Journal of Psychological Type , 55, Wallick, M.

Does the admissions committee select medical students in its own image? Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society , 8 , For any assessment used in development, one of the most important questions is, has it demonstrated effective outcomes and made a difference to people? The MBTI assessment has been shown to be useful for a range of real-life personal and organizational outcomes, including, for example, improved grades in students whose teachers had received MBTI-based training McPeek et al.

Eighty-eight percent agreed or strongly agreed that they capitalized on their strengths more, 73 percent that they felt more confident in their personal life, 72 percent that they felt more confident in their contributions at work, and 65 percent that they made better decisions. Other research conducted by CPP, Inc. Then, for each assessment the participant recalled completing, she or he was asked how useful the information provided by the assessment was.

In a second sample of about 1, people who had completed the MBTI assessment and who obtained a quality interpretation of the results, rather than just being provided a four-letter type, the participants were asked if they would recommend the MBTI assessment to a friend or colleague.

Of these 1, people 96 percent indicated they would recommend it. They were further asked about a variety of possible benefits from learning about their MBTI type.

As can be seen in the next figure, which summarizes results, most participants reported experiencing several benefits. Allread, W. Does personality affect the risk of developing musculoskeletal discomfort? Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 7 2 , Amato, C. Enhancing student team effectiveness: Application of Myers-Briggs personality assessment in business courses. Journal of Marketing Education , 27, Bishop-Clark, C. The effects of personality type on web-based distance learning.

Journal of Educational Technology Systems , 35 4 , Bowen, P. Cognitive style factors affecting database query performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems , 4, Bradley-Geist, J. Homogeneity of personality in occupations and organizations: A comparison of alternative statistical tests. Journal of Business Psychology , 27, Briggs, S. Accountants for the 21st century, where are you? Critical Perspectives on Accounting , 18, Brown, F.

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and transformational leadership. Journal of Management Development , 28 10 , Buckworth, J. Incorporating personality assessment into counseling to help students adopt and maintain exercise behaviors.

Journal of College Counseling , 5, Choi, K. S, Deek, F. Exploring the underlying aspects of pair programming: The impact of personality. Information and Software Technology , 50, Du Toit, F.

The relation between personality type and sense of coherence among technical workers. South African Business Review , 9 1 , Fleenor, J. Kirby Eds. Boston, MA: Nicholas Brealey. Gallen, T. Managers and strategic decisions: Does the cognitive style matter? Journal of Management Development , 25 2 , Journal of Psychological Type , 41, Glaman, J. The effects of co-worker similarity on the emergence of affect in work teams.

Hackston, J. Type and email communication: A research study from OPP. Haley, U. Cognitive trails in strategic decision-making: Linking theories of personalities and cognitions. Journal of Management Studies , 26 5 , Hammer, Ed. Hautala, T. The effects of subordinates' personality on appraisals of transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies , 11 4 , The relationship between personality and transformational leadership.

Journal of Management Development , 25 8 , Horacek, T. Journal of Nutrition Education , 30 6 , Hough, J. An empirical test of cognitive style and strategic decision outcomes.

Journal of Management Studies , 42 2 , Kilmann, R. Interpersonal conflict-handling behavior as reflections of Jungian personality dimensions. Psychological Reports , 37 3 , Mills, J.

Conflict-handling and personality dimensions of project-management personnel. Psychological Reports , 57 3 , Schullery, N. Are heterogeneous or homogeneous groups more beneficial to students? Journal of Management Education , 30 4 , And to my mind, that actually means that it approaches something more like religion than science.

The first is that because the language of type that it offers is incredibly simple. You and I use terms like extroversion and introversion, thinking and feeling all the time in our everyday discourse. It only wants you to accept who you are and through that kind of acceptance, start making decisions that will make you happy, start bringing your behavior into alignment with your preferences. Friends of mine that are on OKCupid or Tinder are always sending me these screenshots of people who put their type in their profile.

Our mission at Marketplace is to raise the economic intelligence of the country. Marketplace helps you understand it all, will fact-based, approachable, and unbiased reporting. Generous support from listeners and readers is what powers our nonprofit news—and your donation today will help provide this essential service. Skip to content. Shelf Life. Janet Nguyen Oct 30, Share Now on:. Share Now:. Courtesy of Penguin Random House.